
Which means basically that I did all of the same things (keeping them constant) except for two changes I thought might improve the results (the variables). Now, strictly speaking, for a "pure" experiment I would have only changed one thing, and thus known exactly to what I should attribute any results, but I'm a little impatient, and I was willing to accept that a positive result could be due to either variable.
As it happens, the results were near identical, which does actually tell me something-- it tells me that if I want to get different results, I'll have to change a different variable. Unfortunately, the remaining variables are all specifically recipe related rather than technique, and I'm not sure I want to mess around with different flours or anything. I may just decide to be happy with what I'm getting now, since it's perfectly serviceable pizza crust.
For the record-- I'm using Mark Bittman's basic pizza dough recipe from How to Cook Everything (app edition), and I was messing with hydration levels (amount of water in the recipe), cooking temp, and fermentation time (overnight in the fridge instead of an hour or two on the counter).
You know there actually is a Pizza Due in Chicago, right?
ReplyDeleteOh, sure. But I was due for a second pizza post anyway, and I didn't think anyone reading the post would be confused.
Delete